I feel that the advantages of this method are that, it helps develop a sense of muscle memory for that particular scene, which gives actors a better sense of their characters physicality; by improvising as them it makes it easier to move as them. I also think that this applies to the memory of the scenes key points as well, again making it easier to remember the venue and the lines, and also making it easier to improvise the scene in case something goes wrong onstage.
The downside to this exercise, however is that some actors may feel that it is more of a memory test than an improvisation, due to the given circumstances being so restricted. This makes the improvisation feel forced and therefore unhelpful. This ultimately, makes the entire exercise useless to the actor and the production.
Therefore, I feel that, although the exercise is extremely useful, this exercise should be used when the actor has fully understood their given circumstances, preferably further into the process but not too late into it.
This is interesting . I study at a school where Mike Alfreds is the main consultant and contributor on our syllabus. We use this technique after we have really ‘actioned’ our script. So we read the script, state the action and paraphrase the script whilst physically employing the action on our partner and the re read the script. Results are usually v insightful. Also Mike’s book ‘different every night’ is a great tool ( although you get some v funny looks if you are reading it on the tube) !
ReplyDelete